#BELNED: on policy, trust and cultural differences


Following the success of the M&A Awards, we invite Belgian professionals active in M&A, corporate finance, private equity, entrepreneurs and executives to gather more regularly. The M&A Fora are an occasion to get to know each other better and to share knowledge and experiences. The topic of the first M&A Forum was Belgium-the Netherlands, with a keynote by professor emeritus Leo Sleuwaegen.

Professor Sleuwaegen worked at KULeuven and Vlerick Business School, but also at the Erasmus University in Rotterdam for more than twenty years, where he was involved in studies about economic policy. As an insider in both countries, he’s the ideal person to share some comparative insights.

To jump straight to the conclusion: in terms of economy, the Netherlands has in recent decades embarked on a growth spurt that leaves the Belgians miles behind. The difference in GDP alone is striking in this regard. In the 1950’s, GDP was still about the same in both countries, but since then, there grew a serious gap and it’s getting bigger and bigger. In other words: the Netherlands has become a lot richer than Belgium in recent years and is also expanding its lead.

An important reason for this is, for example, the employment rate. The rate is no less than 22% higher in our northern neighbor. In only one sector can we beat the Dutch: more Belgians work in public administration.


Heavy regularizations


International figures from the Global Competitiveness Report that professor Sleuwaegen brought along, also show the supremacy of the Netherlands. On almost all parameters measured in the report (‘Innovation capacity’, ‘Financial system’, ‘Institutions’, and ‘Infrastructure’), the Netherlands scores far better. On parameters such as ‘ICT’, ‘Labor Market’, and ‘Skills’, the difference is almost embarrassingly large. Even on ‘Health’ – where Belgium was leading for years – the Dutch leave us in the dust. The differences in, for example, ‘Business Dynamism’ and ‘Product Market’ are, according to the professor, mainly due to the heavy regularizations in Belgium and because many markets are too closed to competition.

The Netherlands’ advantage is already visible in the field. In the Netherlands, many more new companies are set up each year and there are also many more “high-growth” companies. And even if Belgium spends more money on R&D and government support for R&D, there are a lot more design, patent and trademark applications each year in the Netherlands.


Market mechanisms


Professor emeritus Leo Sleuwaegen

The reasons for all this need not be far-fetched, says the professor. The Netherlands believes much more in free market forces than Belgium and, in that respect, has made an enormous turnaround since the 1980’s. Whereas the Dutch economy used to rely heavily on holdings and closed systems, they now rely much more on market mechanisms. In Belgium there is still much more state intervention, and the government is getting more resources instead of less.

There are also many cultural differences between the Dutch and the Belgians. Hierarchy, status and respect for the boss are much more important in Belgium. Belgians are also much more risk-averse. These variables are important because they determine the politics of a country and therefore also have an impact on the economic landscape.




The question then arises: what should Belgium do? Professor Sleuwaegen argues for (neo-)liberal solutions. Government subsidies must be cut, social security must be reformed, and the power of the government must be curtailed. Belgium must open up its markets much more and become less bureaucratic. However, the professor thinks that this will only happen if Belgium is “forced” to do so because of external circumstances.


Reflections of a Dutchman in Brussels


Willem Wynaendts, investor, board member and Senior Partner at Associés en Gouvernance

The afternoon was rounded off by Willem Wynaendts, a Dutch investor and former executive at AXA, who has been living in Belgium for years. For him, there are interesting investment opportunities in Belgium and he pointed out the difference in the way business is done in the Netherlands and Belgium. He particularly appreciates the friendly and warm atmosphere in Belgium, with people who are professional and genuinely interested in others. This often provides a stark contrast to the sometimes overly harsh directness of the Dutch, he says.




After a Q&A, there was time for networking with drinks and bites. You can watch the pictures here.
The next M&A Forum is for Young M&A (up to 35 years) on June 16.


Recente artikelen


Of het nu gaat om alomvattende softwarepakketten of losse tools afgestemd op aparte processen, technologie is overal in HR-land. Dat betekent echter niet dat de implementatie van zulke systemen altijd van een leien dakje loopt. Tijdens een rondetafelgesprek op de CHRO Day wisselden enkele HR-directeuren leermomenten en best practices uit. Het relaas van een boeiend debat over de soms frustrerende snoepwinkel van HRIT.


Zo’n honderd CFO’s en financieel directeuren maakten tijdens de zesde editie van de CFO Day ruimte voor tijd. We hadden het over het belang van één seconde en 125 jaar, over oorlog en hoop, veiligheid en regeneratie. Because time matters.


Op woensdag 3 juli organiseren we de tweede editie van onze CMO Schakeltafel. Een gastronomische avond met een select gezelschap van CMO’s en marketingdirecteuren, waarbij we ervaringen delen en elkaar inspireren rond het thema 'No future without a past: vooruitkijken vanuit een strategische terugblik’. 


Buitengewoon inspirerend en verfrissend. Ideaal voor zelfreflectie en om nieuwe ideeën op te doen.